Back to knowledge center

Research publication

Clean-up of mining-generated environmental waste in South Sudan using livestock excreta

September 16, 2024

Extraction of mineral ores is a prominent world-wide socio-economic activity. It is common in South Sudan. The strategic importance of the sector has attracted significant investments in the mineral-rich ecological zone by the government and foreign direct investments especially. Crude oil is the most exploited mineral in the area. The extractive industry entails several processes in the oil value chain. These are performed before, during and after the discovery of an oil rich site. Despite the rich oil deposits, South Sudan is commonly cited by studies reporting about its dirtiest oil industry worldwide. At the same time, the country has a high number of livestock whose excreta has been proven as an excellent clean-up agent for mining-generated waste from the environment. Thus, the purpose of the study was to establish the efficacy livestock waste in the environmental clean-up of mining generated environmental waste in South Sudan. Data were collected through ex situ experiments that were conducted in a screen house at the University of Juba for a period of ten months. Results of the study revealed that cow dung degrades hydrocarbon contaminants using resident bacteria. Besides, when applied in a medium like blank soil, cow dung creates alluring conditions for soil microorganisms including bacteria to chelate hydrocarbon contaminants. The study concluded that application of livestock waste is a promising approach for attaining environmental conservation amidst mining. The study recommended need for scientific studies to explore best practices for deploying livestock excreta and more so, consortia for effective environmental clean-up of mining waste.

Introduction

Living in a clean and healthy environment is one of man’s greatest needs. Generally, it is a fundamental human right as reflected in resolution A/76/L.75 of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (IISD, 2022). On the pathway to realizing this objective, there is a trade-off caused by necessary socio-economic activities. Such activities are sanctioned by the governments and supported by development partners to appropriate development goals. Mining is one of these strategic resources that must be exploited in mineral resource rich countries such as South Sudan. The country is prominent for oil and gas (Atim, 2023; Ruley, 2022; Ruley et al., 2020a, b). Most of South Sudan’s oil deposits are shared with Sudan (Atim, 2023). In terms of productivity, South Sudan has the third most prominent oil reserves in Africa with a production potential of about 3.5 million barrels per year (Mayar, 2021). Despite this endowment, about 90% of the gas and oil reserves remain untapped (Anadolu Agency, 2022; Mayar, 2021). Furthermore, although gas and oil are catapulting development in South Sudan, reports (such as Aurelio, 2019; Global Atlas of Environmental Justice, 2021; Ruley et al., 2020a, b; Ruley, 2022; SUSA Africa, 2020) have shown that South Sudan’s mining industry and particularly crude oil activities is not environmentally sensitive. Neethu et al. (2019) and Ruley et al. (2022) noted that much as petroleum derived products are an energy source and raw materials for strategic industries (such as petrochemical), environs where the extraction occurs are prone to accidental spill throughout the value chain. For instance, the soil is contaminated with PAHs, groundwater sources are equally contaminated as well as the air (Gotch, 2022). As a result, soil productivity has declined tremendously, wildlife and livestock mortality has been reported as well as strange skin diseases, coughing, birth deformities and miscarriages (Aurelio, 2019; Liam, 2020; Saturlino, 2023; Titmamer, 2022). The increasing nature of the above challenges has raised ire of South Sudanese who have organized protests and demonstrations in the past (Danga, 2020). This public outcry has attracted the attention of the government of South Sudan to carry out an audit of oil and gas companies in order to curb pollution (Reuters, 2020; Xinhua, 2021).

Irrespective of the negative environmental externalities reported above, mineral exploitation in South Sudan, oil inclusive must continue because mineral exploitation is the basis of national development. Given this fact that mining is necessary evil, the challenges ought to be ameliorated. While there is a score of chemicals, physical and electrical means of cleaning up mineral pollutants, PAHs inclusive, Ruley et al. (2022) established that deployment of these strategies is very expensive and therefore, the colossal sums of money to clean up the polluted areas is not available. This accounts for why biological means have been resorted to (Ruley et al., 2020a). The bioremediation of mining generated waste is eco-friendly and cheap compared to other remediation or clean-up approaches. Neethu et al. (2019) and Ruley (2023) recommended deployment of livestock waste and a cocktail or consortia of livestock waste for clean-up of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). This study focused on cow dung because Heinrichs et al. (2023) reported that mature cows pass out dung every 1.5 to 2 hours and excrete a total of 45kgs per day, leading to more abundance.

South Sudan is a livestock rich nation (Report Linker, 2022). World Vision (2018) notes that the country has about 12 million heads of cattle, 20 million heads of sheep and about 25 million heads of goats. These numbers of cattle, sheep and goats (Atit, 2014) are higher than the human population which is estimated at 10,748,272 people in 2021 (World Bank, 2022). This abundance puts South Sudan in a strategic position as the number 1 country worldwide in terms of animal wealth per capita (World Vision, 2018) and in Africa (Doki, 2014). While income and food are the some of the key reasons why the range of livestock is enormous, the cultural norms especially marriage stand out as of the key determinants of raising large herds (FAO in South Sudan, 2021). According to World Vision (2018), the numbers of cows paid for bride price range between 30 and 100 heads and for this reason, households keep large numbers of livestock. The abundance of livestock in South Sudan implies that livestock waste is abundant. Thus, the purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of livestock waste in cleaning up crude oil pollutants from oil extraction sites in South Sudan.

Methods

Data were obtained from a screen house experiment that was carried out ex situ at the University of Juba, South Sudan between January 2023 and October 2023. A blank soil sample was collected away from the crude oil extraction sites. At this area, the soil sample was considered to be natural and undisturbed. Crude oil samples were collected from Paloich Payam at the Dar Petroleum Operation Base Camp. The cow dung was collected from livestock farmers and fermented for two months to allow for partial decomposition. The blank soil samples were artificially contaminated crude oil at a rate of 75 gkg -1 soil. The treatments in three replicates were arranged in a Completely Randomized Design. The hydrocarbon components were analyzed using gas chromatography technique. The removal of TPH was confirmed using Total ion chromatograms (TIC) (Figure 1).

Results

The application of cow dung to artificially contaminated blank soil degraded TPH. As seen in the control (Panel a), after artificial contamination of the blank soil with crude oil, 27 hydrocarbon ions were detected (from n-C13 to n-C40). When cow dung 5gkg -1 soil was introduced in the treatment, there was a reduction in the abundance and concentrations of hydrocarbon ions after 4 months (120 days) to 17 hydrocarbon ions (n-C22 to n-C37) (Panel b). After 8 months (240days), the cow dung further degraded TPH to 8 hydrocarbon ions (n-C25 to n-C33) (Panel c). The reduction in the numbers of hydrocarbon ions observed in this study could be attributed to the action of autochthonous bacteria resident in the applied cow dung. These bacteria have proven potential to scavenge on crude oil compounds and use them as food. Besides, they also breakdown hydrocarbon compounds into innocuous products that are less destructive to the environment. Mondal et al. (2021) confirmed that cow dung is a hot spot for various strains of bacteria. This was confirmed by Ruley (2022) who noted that cattle manure is a natural reservoir for bacteria genera, Bacillus, Luteimonas and Pseudomonas. Moreover, it was equally espoused by Manyi-Loh et al. (2016) that when cow dung is applied to the soil environment Firmicutes (and more especially Bacillus and Clostridium) are added. Moreover, Bhatt and Maheshwari (2019) and Mukhuba et al. (2018) equally reported that cow dung and digestate harbor Acinetobacter while Serratia and Pseudomonas were detected by Gupta et al. (2016). As well, the application of cow dung to the contaminated soil sample must have activated the resident strains of bacteria in the soil sample and empowering them to launch an invasive attack on the crude oil contaminants at 4 and 8 months respectively. This finding is in consonance with Roth et al. (2015) that the improvement in the environmental conditions is associated with an increase in richness of autochthonous microorganisms with K-strategist acquiring the ability to outgrow and survive the stressful environments.

Discussion

As observed in the TIC diagram after 8 months, there were remnants of hydrocarbon compounds. The remaining 9 ions are classified as recalcitrant and therefore, these could not be completely eliminated by the cow dung. These must have been high molecular weight (ions) especially those that have more benzene rings such as pyrene and coronene. Okere and Semple (2012) reported that high molecular weight hydrocarbons exist in particulate form and therefore, their half-life is by far higher in a soil medium.

(a) No Treatment

(b) Treatement with cow dung 5gkg -1 soil after 4months

(c) Treatment with cow dung 5gkg -1 soil after 8 months

Figure 1 : Total ion chromatograms (TIC) showing removal of TPH from blank soil medium by cow dung treatment.

Conclusion

Given the reportedly high per capita animal wealth of South Sudan and the increased importance assigned to the mining industry, livestock excreta can become an excellent resource for riding the mining sites and their surroundings of contaminants especially those originating from crude oil extraction. The exemplar of cow dung has provided proof that livestock waste holds promise for enhancing the rejuvenation of mining-polluted environment. The study therefore concludes that deployment of cow dung should be prioritized in the ecorestoration of the crude oil contaminated environments in the country. It is recommended that more scientific studies be conducted to determine the most effective and efficient ways through the currently abundant cow dung in the different parts of South Sudan could be harnessed to invigorate the environment. Studies could also venture into deployment of a cocktail of various livestock excreta to establish whether the consortium could potentially sustain the complete elimination of the recalcitrant hydrocarbon ions reported by this study.

Acknowledgements

An invaluable credit is extended to Dar Petroleum Operating Company Limited for providing crude oil sample that were used for the experiments.

References

  1. 1.Anadolu Agency (2022 July 8). ‘Despite oil wealth, South Sudan reels under poverty’ Retrieved on 10 January 2024 from https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/oil/-despite-oil-wealth-south-sudan-reels-under-poverty-/35777.
  2. 2.Atim, L.R. (2023 January 23). Overview of South Sudan oil, gas, and energy information. Retrieved on 20 January 2024 from https://centurionlg.com/2023/01/23/overview-of-south-sudan-oil-gas-and-energy-information/.
  3. 3.Atit, M. (2014 October 23). South Sudan in focus: South Sudan looks to livestock to break oil dependence. Retrieved on 6 February 2024 from https://www.voaafrica.com /a/south-Sudan-economy-livestock-oil-igad/2492428.html.
  4. 4.Aurelio, D.S. (2019 December 27). South Sudan in Focus: South Sudan Oil Spill Causes Environmental Damage, Health Problems. Retrieved on 8 February 2024 from https://www.voaafrica.com/a/africa_south-sudan-focus_south-sudan-oil-spill-causes-environmental-damage-health-problems/6181718.html.
  5. 5.Bhatt, K., & Maheshwari, D. K. (2019). Decoding multifarious role of cow dung bacteria in mobilization of zinc fractions along with growth promotion of C. annuum L. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-10.
  6. 6.Danga, D.M. (2020 August 27). South Sudan residents protest oil facilities. Retrieved on 30 January 2024 from https://www.voaafrica.com/a/africa_south-sudan-focus_south-sudan-residents-protest-oil-facilities/6195077.html.
  7. 7.Doki, C. (2014 May 12). South Sudan, where livestock outnumbers people and the environment suffers. Retrieved on 1 February 2024 from https://reliefweb.int/report/south-sudan/south-sudan-where-livestock-outnumbers-people-and-environment-suffers.
  8. 8.FAO in South Sudan (2021 November 23). Beyond prestige: FAO Livestock Show in Kuajok promotes commercialization of cows, sheep and goats. Retrieved on 5 February 2024 from https://www.fao.org/south-sudan/news/detail-events/en/c/1456968/.
  9. 9.Global Atlas of Environmental Justice (2021 October 14). Oil contamination in Thar Jath, South Sudan. Retrieved on 7 February 2024 from https://ejatlas.org/conflict/oil-contamination-in-south-sudan.
  10. 10.Gotch, M.A. (2022 January 25). China explores South Sudan’s oil sector without environmental care. United States of America: Hoover Institution Press and Stanford University.
  11. 11.Gupta, K. K., Aneja, K. R., & Rana, D. (2016). Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 3(1), 1-11.
  12. 12.Heinrichs, J., Varga, G.A., & Kononoff, P. (2023 April 26). Using Manure Evaluation to Enhance Dairy Cattle Nutrition. Retrieved on 15 March 2024 from https://extension.psu.edu/using-manure-evaluation-to-enhance-dairy-cattle-nutrition
  13. 13.IISD (2022 August 3). UNGA Recognizes Human Right to Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable Environment. Retrieved on 20 February 2024 from https://sdg.iisd.org/news/unga-recognizes-human-right-to-clean-healthy-and-sustainable-environment/.
  14. 14.Liam, J. (2020 February 14). South Sudan government buried reports which suggest oil pollution is causing miscarriages and 'alarming' birth defects in children. Retrieved on 27 February 2024 from https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/south-sudan-government-oil-pollution-reports-health-birth-defects-children-a9335046.html.
  15. 15.Manyi-Loh, C. E., Mamphweli, S. N., Meyer, E. L., Makaka, G., Simon, M., & Okoh, A. I. (2016). An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(9), 843.
  16. 16.Mayar, M.D. (2021 July 6). South Sudan in Focus: South Sudan's Oil Industry Remains Dependent on Foreign Help. Retrieved on 7 February 2024 from https://www.voaafrica.com/a/africa_ south-sudan-focus_south-sudans-oil-industry-remains-dependent-foreign-help/6207908.html.
  17. 17.Mayen, D. (2020 September 4). South Sudan pledges to clean up oil pollution after locals protests. Retrieved on 23 February 2024 from https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/news/east-africa/south-sudan-pledges-to-clean-up-oil-pollution-after-locals-protests-1931118.
  18. 18.Mondal, S. K., Samantaray, D. P., & Mishra, B. B. (2020). Hydrocarbon Degradation by Bacteria Isolated from Cow Dung. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 9(1), 1134-1139.
  19. 19.Mukhuba, M., Roopnarain, A., Adeleke, R., Moeletsi, M., & Makofane, R. (2018). Comparative assessment of bio-fertiliser quality of cow dung and anaerobic digestion effluent. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 4(1), 1435019.
  20. 20.Neethu, T. M., Dubey, P. K., Kaswala, A. R., & Patel, K. G. (2019). Cow dung as a bioremediation agent to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated agricultural soils. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 38(6), 1-9.
  21. 21.Okere, U., & Semple, K. (2012). Biodegradation of PAHs in ‘pristine’soils from different climatic regions. Journal of Bioremediation and Biodegradation Sciences, 1(2).
  22. 22.Pandey, P., Kapley, A., & Brar, S. K. (2021). Biodegradation of High Molecular Weight Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons in different environments. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2079.
  23. 23.Report Linker (2022). South Sudan livestock industry outlook 2022 – 2026. Retrieved on 5 February 2024 from https://www.reportlinker.com/clp/country/8/726445.
  24. 24.Reuters (2020 January 10). South Sudan plans environmental audit of oil fields in move to curb pollution. Retrieved on 17 February 2024 from https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1Z90IO/.
  25. 25.Roth, E., Samara, N., Ackermann, M., Seiml-Buchinger, R., Saleh, A., & Ruess, L. (2015). Fertilization and irrigation practice as source of microorganisms and the impact on nematodes as their potential vectors. Applied Soil Ecology, 90, 68-77.
  26. 26.Ruley, J. A., Galla, J. O., Massawe, P., Ladu, J. L. C., & Tumuhairwe, J. B. (2023). Pseudomonas as Backbone for Environmental Health. In Microbiomes for the Management of Agricultural Sustainability (pp. 239-253). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  27. 27.Ruley, J. A. N. (2022). Bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soils using native plants and their rhizobacteria in the Sudd region of South-Sudan (Doctoral dissertation, Makerere University, Kampala-Uganda).
  28. 28.Ruley, J. A., Amoding, A., Tumuhairwe, J. B., & Basamba, T. A. (2022). Rhizoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon–contaminated soils: a systematic review of mutualism between phytoremediation species & soil living microorganisms. Phytoremediation, 263-296.
  29. 29.Ruley, J. A., Tumuhairwe, J. B., Amoding, A., Westengen, O. T., & Vinje, H. (2020b). Rhizobacteria communities of phytoremediation plant species in petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil of the Sudd ecosystem, South Sudan. International Journal of Microbiology, 2020.
  30. 30.Ruley, J. A., Amoding, A., Tumuhairwe, J. B., Basamba, T. A., Opolot, E., & Oryem-Origa, H. (2020a). Enhancing the phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils in the Sudd wetlands, South Sudan, using organic manure. Applied and environmental soil science, 2020, 1-8.
  31. 31.Saturlino, M. M. A. (2023). Oil exploration and its effects on the environment and pastoralist communities in the Upper Nile region of South Sudan. European University Institute.
  32. 32.SUSA Africa (2020 October 4). How South Sudan’s oil industry is destroying the environment. Retrieved on 22 February 2024 from https://susafrica.com/2020/10/04/how-south-sudans-oil-industry-is-destroying-the-environment/.
  33. 33.Tiitmamer, N. (2022). Remediating South Sudan's war-induced petroleum environmental damage: Environmental baseline conditions and current impacts. Sudd Institute.
  34. 34.World Bank (2022). South Sudan: Country Profile. Retrieved on 20 March 2024 from https://datacommons.org/place/country/SSD?utm_medium=explore&mprop=count&popt=Person&hl=en#.
  35. 35.World Vision (2018 August 28). South Sudan’s livestock heroes save animals to save lives. Retrieved on 30 January 2024 from https://www.wvi.org/africa/article/south-sudan%E2%80%99s-livestock-heroes-save-animals-save-lives.
  36. 36.Xinhua (2021 January 14). South Sudan resumes environmental audit in oil-field areas. Retrieved on 21 February 2024 from http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-01/14/c_139668469.htm.